Prior to the Second World War, Bombay had established merchant networks with several Japanese port cities and they drove an enormous global trade in cotton and textiles between the Indian subcontinent and Imperial Japan. Business has become a renewed priority for both countries today, offering fresh opportunities for collaboration
This is the first of a three-part series. Read the second part of the series here, and the third part here.
The turn of the 21st century has seen a dramatic upswing in the India-Japan bilateral, which has been upgraded to a Special Strategic and Global Partnership in 2014[1] from a Strategic and Global Partnership (2006). This enhancement is intended to jointly tackle changed global geopolitical and economic dynamics, triggered largely by an irredentist China and, more recently, an inward-looking United States. The rapport and friendship that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Prime Minister Shinzo Abe share have given a further impetus to bilateral ties, particularly stronger economic engagements.
Japanese banks, firms and companies (some with a Bombay legacy) are not only more active, but also visible in Mumbai, Bangalore and New Delhi[2]. In Mumbai, the metro rail project, underwritten by Japanese Overseas Development Assistance,[3] is everywhere as it snakes its way through the innards of the city.
This crest on the main gate of Jamsetjee Nusserwanji Tata’s Bombay home (or the old Tata Palace) was part of a more elaborate one appearing on the Tata Lines flag
Sifra Lentin is Adjunct Fellow, Bombay History Studies, Gateway House.
This is the first of a three-part series. Read the second part of the series here, and the third part here.
This article was exclusively written for Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations. You can read more exclusive content here.
For interview requests with the author, or for permission to republish, please contact outreach@gatewayhouse.in
[2] New Delhi and Bangalore are major hubs for Japanese businesses with a significant Japanese expat population, where a century ago Bombay and Calcutta were the nodal cities.
[3] Japan International Co-operation Agency (JICA) along with Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (MMRCL), a joint venture between the Indian government and the Maharashtra state government, are executing the Mumbai Metro Line-3 project (MML-3). The MML-3 project is estimated to cost Rs 23,136 crore.
[4] This led to friction between countries (including India) in the Imperial Customs Union and Japan during the years 1926-1934. The mill industry of Bombay and Ahmedabad along with Lancashire’s began seeking tariff protection from imports of Japanese cloth. As a retaliation Japan imposed tariffs on imports of pig iron from India. This was finally resolved with an understanding (Indo-Japanese Trade Protocol) in 1934 which brought down tariffs on Japanese cloth from 75% to 50%.
[5] The Tokugawa Shoguns subjugated feudal fiefdoms by establishing centralised rule in Japan. Their capital city was Edo (today’s Tokyo).
[6] The Tokugawa Shogunates’ concern with political stability in Japan also meant that they feared foreign ideas and potential military intervention by European powers. They were acutely aware that the colonial expansion of Spain and Portugal in Asia had been made possible by the work of Catholic missionaries, hence the Shoguns came to view the missionaries as a threat to their rule. Measures to expel them from the country culminated in the promulgation of three exclusion decrees in the 1630s, which effected a complete ban on Christianity. In issuing these orders, the Tokugawa Shogunate officially adopted a policy of national seclusion. From 1633 onward Japanese subjects were forbidden to travel abroad or to return from overseas, and foreign contact was limited to a few Chinese and Dutch merchants who were still allowed to trade at the southern port of Nagasaki.
[7] This first treaty was with the United States, is known as the Harris Treaty and was signed aboard the USS Powhatan in Edo Bay on 29 July 1858.
[8] Overy Richard, The Times Complete History of the World (London, Harper Collins, Eight Edition Reprint 2011), p.197.
Jackson, Stanley, The Sassoons (London, William Heinemann Ltd., 1968), p. 24.
[9] One should not confuse the current Mitsui & Co. Ltd. India, as being a continuation of the old
[10] Consul Goh in his letter of introduction to the Governor of Bombay on 4 December, stated that the Consulate was located at 9 Churchgate Street (Fort).
[11] Nishimura Shizuyu, Toshio Suzuki and Ranald Michie, edited, The Origins of International Banking in Asia: The Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (United Kingdom, Oxford University Press, 2012), p.181.
[12] Japanese mills enjoyed a higher labour productivity, low costs, finer counts of cloth and a currency weighed in its favor
[13] Nippon Menkwa Kabushiki Kaisha was headquartered in Osaka. The Bombay office was located in Nippon Building on Outram Road.
[14] The Tommen and Nichimen firms by 1918-19 had a mix of Japanese and Indian employees who went into the cotton growing regions to buy and have the raw cotton ginned (cleaned) and baled, and then transported to the city for shipping to Japan. The process involved a mix of financial instruments to underwrite it that ranged from forward contracts from the Japanese mills, letters of credit, bills of exchange and even the local Hundis, IOUs or bills of exchange. It appears that these two firms conducted the inland purchases for the Japanese firms in Bombay.
[15] Tikekar, Aroon, A Century of Ties: Bombay And Japan (Bombay, The Consulate General of Japan in Bombay, 1994), p.11.
[16] The Deccan Plateau of India has black volcanic soil, which is ideal for growing cotton.
[17] Tata Lines’ reduced freight charges – as compared to P&O and others – for cotton, yarn, cloth and opium varied between 29 and 47%.
[18] These ‘loyalty rebates’ were given to customers after they signed an undertaking that they had never been interested in any shipment carried by Tata Lines during that year.