Print This Post
15 March 2019, Gateway House & CIGI

Preparing for Climate Intervention Decision Making in the Global South: A Role for Canada and India

The use of climate intervention technologies has not taken into sufficient account the social dimensions of climate intervention research, which includes citizen participation and pooling of knowledge resources. To fill this lacuna, Canada and India can examine what participation in climate intervention research means in the context of an African country to be able to evolve a more international view; urge both countries to conduct national policy discussions on climate intervention research; and increase public awareness of climate intervention technologies

post image

Countries in the Global South are incentivized through funding schemes, such as the Solar Radiation Management Governance Initiative (SRMGI) Decimal Fund, to invest in pathways that could lead toward justification for deployment of climate intervention technologies, but without adequate consideration of the social dimensions of engagement in climate intervention research. When considering the pressing problem of climate change, and the pressing need for access to innovative, clean and sustainable technologies, it is clear that simply funding basic climate engineering modelling will not be effective in supporting climate intervention experimentation. This lack of inclusiveness across disciplines is unfortunate because citizen participation and co-construction of knowledge require an appropriate and thorough study of social science.

The paper recommends a three-step process to remedy this oversight: Canada and India could engage with a leading African country to consider what participation in climate intervention research would mean in their context and to develop a view point to engage on the topic at an international level; encourage Canadian and Indian counterparts to conduct national policy discussions on climate intervention research; and increase public awareness of climate intervention technologies, coupled with democratic participatory governance.

It is important to ensure responsible knowledge creation and action. Such arrangements can guard against undesirable research outcomes and ensure that research efforts, considered collectively, are inclusive, anticipatory and guided by societal needs and concerns.

India-CanadaPaper4_Cover

This paper is part of the India-Canada Track 1.5 Dialogue. View the first, second and third part of this four-part paper series. 

India-Canada Track 1.5 Dialogue on Innovation, Growth and Prosperity is a collaboration between Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations and the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI)

The India-Canada Track 1.5 Dialogue works jointly on multilateral issues and identifies areas where improved cooperation could benefit both countries. To address these challenges, the papers produced under this partnership will help to develop policy recommendations to promote innovation and navigate shared governance issues that are integral to the continued growth of Canada-India bilateral relations.

You can download the PDF version of this paper here.

Timiebi Aganaba-Jeanty, Assistant Professor, School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University & Fellow, Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI).

This paper was exclusively written for Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations. You can read more exclusive content here.

For interview requests with the author, or for permission to republish, please contact outreach@gatewayhouse.in.

© Copyright 2019 Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized copying or reproduction is strictly prohibited.

TAGGED UNDER: , , , ,