Print This Post
22 November 2017, Gateway House

India-Japan lunar bid: targeting tech gap?

The two countries’ proposal to carry out a robotic sample-return mission to the Moon in the 2020s is a laudable attempt at catching up with Beijing’s rather more advanced lunar agenda. And there are many lessons that Japan can offer India

Fellow, Space and Ocean Studies Programme

post image

India and Japan took their deepening natural partnership [1] [2] into outer space when the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) divulged that they may jointly carry out a sample-return mission to the Moon[3].

There is a sound rationale for this even though the two countries have independent plans to go to the moon: ISRO’s Chandrayaan-2 orbiter-lander-rover mission is proposed for launch in 2018 and JAXA’s Smart Lander for Investigating Moon (SLIM) mission in 2019. They have had success in the past too: since 2007-08, JAXA’s Selene orbiter and ISRO’s first orbiter-impactor, Chandrayaan-1 have found water on the moon[4], discovered lunar volcanic tubes, which could serve as sites for human habitation[5] [6], and mapped the eternally dark Shackleton crater[7], among others. Their concern is the wide techno-economic gap with Beijing, which is playing an efficient game of catch-up with Washington. This, in turn, is affecting the geostrategic balance of power in the Indo-Pacific, and likewise, India’s and Japan’s security outlook.

Catching up makes comparisons inevitable. While New Delhi and Tokyo took 10 long years to graduate from orbiter to the forthcoming landing-roving demonstrations, Beijing undertook four lunar missions from 2007 to 2014: the last of them, Chang’e 5-T1, went around the moon, practicing a sample-return mission. In 2018-2019, when India and Japan will carry out SLIM and Chandrayaan-2, Beijing will be technologically far ahead with its back-to-back sample-return missions, Chang’e-5 and Chang’e-6, that are likely to bring back a few kilograms of lunar soil and rocks for high-end analyses[8]. These analyses will be vital for Beijing to develop space systems and technologies for safely carrying out human-rated missions in the 2020s[9]. Beijing’s fast-tracked lunar exploration programme has put it on par with the United States and Russia, which are also preparing for human-rated moon missions in the 2020s.

A joint moon mission makes sense also because it is thriftier to pool resources when up against the economically stronger countries, China, United States and Russia. Besides, there are many lessons that Japan can offer India, such as its success with public-private collaboration in the space launch and exploration sector: for nearly two decades, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has been the primary manufacturer and operator of JAXA’s expendable launch system[10]. New Delhi is mulling over privatising the manufacturing, management, and launch operations of its Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle by 2020.[11]

The partnership will also stimulate development of several crucial technologies, such as the electric ion propulsion (EIP) engines. ISRO recently demonstrated its EIP engines on the South Asia Satellite[12], a strategic undertaking of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Neighbourhood First Policy. JAXA’s EIP engines have performed intricate and autonomous manoeuvring of the Hayabusa space probe (launched in 2003) that touched the surface of asteroid Itokawa, 300 million miles away from the Earth[13].

Crucial for any extraterrestrial sample-return mission is the construction of non-polluting and non-contaminating clean-room infrastructure for storage of extra-terrestrial samples.[14] JAXA’s Hayabusa series of sample-return missions has resulted in collaborations with companies, like the Hitachi High-Tech Corporation, to develop this. Such infrastructure will also be crucial for space-station based manufacturing, which is an anticipated major industrial sector in the coming decades.

New Delhi and Tokyo will also have to devise the network for communicating with the proposed spacecraft. India and Japan currently possess one Deep Space Communication Network (DSCN) antenna each: a 32-m antenna in Karnataka and one measuring 64 m in Nagano, Japan. All their outer space missions have been dependent so far on the United States DSCN global triad – three radio antennae, located roughly 120 degrees from each other across the globe – based in California, Spain and Australia. China, Russia, and Europe possess an independent DSCN global triad, which they regarded a national priority. Considering the numerous outer space missions, planned by American public agencies and their thriving private space sector, it is likely that the U.S. DSCN will have too many domestic liabilities to be available for international customers. Therefore, Tokyo and New Delhi should use their partnership to build a DSCN infrastructure each – the state-of-the-art 70-m antenna – on each other’s land parcels. They should together pitch for a property in the Western Hemisphere, akin to what the Chinese acquired in Patagonia, Argentina[15].

Lunar exploration technologies that seemed fantasies in the past are now becoming imminent possibilities. The rush to acquire them is resulting in a space race in Asia that is additionally yielding scientific research and techno-economic growth. It is, therefore, important that the new India-Japan outer-space partnership use the lunar mission as an opportunity to fill the gaps, techno-economic and otherwise.

Dr. Chaitanya Giri is Adjunct Fellow, Space Studies, Gateway House. He is also a ELSI Origins Network Scientist at the Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan. 

This article was exclusively written for Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations. You can read more exclusive content here.

For interview requests with the author, or for permission to republish, please contact outreach@gatewayhouse.in or 022 22023371.

© Copyright 2017 Gateway House: Indian Council on Global Relations. All rights reserved. Any unauthorized copying or reproduction is strictly prohibited.

References

[1] National Research and Development Agency, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) signs Memorandum of Understanding with Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) to Promote Collaboration in the Space Field, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency-Press Release, (New Delhi: Ministry of External Affairs, 11 November 2016) <http://global.jaxa.jp/press/2016/11/20161111_isro.html>

[2] Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, India-Japan joint statement during visit of Prime Minister of Japan to India, (New Delhi: Ministry of External Affairs, 14 September 2017) <http://www.mea.gov.in/bilateral-documents.htm?dtl/28946/>

[3] R. Krishnan, ‘India, Japan look at joint moon mission, will bring samples to Earth’, Business Standard, 18 November 2017, <http://www.business-standard.com/article/economy-policy/india-japan-look-at-joint-moon-mission-will-bring-samples-to-earth-117111701151_1.html>

[4] R. Sridharan et al., ‘‘Direct’ evidence for water (H2O) in the sunlit lunar ambience from CHACE on MIP of Chandrayaan I’, Planetary and Space Science, Vol. 58, 2010, pp. 947-950, <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032063310000693?via%3Dihub>

[5] A.S. Arya et al., ‘Detection of potential site for future human habitability on the Moon using Chandrayaan-1 data’, Current Science, Vol. 100, 2010, pp. 524-529, <http://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/100/04/0524.pdf>

[6] T. Kaku et al., ‘Detection of intact lava tubes at Marius Hills on the Moon by SELENE (Kaguya) Lunar Radar Sounder’, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 44, 2017, pp. 10155-10161, <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2017GL074998/full>

[7] J. Haruyama et al., ‘An explanation of bright areas inside Shackleton Crater at the Lunar South Pole other than water-ice deposits’, Geophysical Research Letters, Vol. 40, 2013, pp. 3814-3818, <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1002/grl.50753/asset/grl50753.pdf?v=1&t=ja68vm1y&s=b04b31dfb01f7acc0ef829e0835751faa0e5c360>

[8] L. Xiao, ‘China’s touch on the moon’, Nature Geoscience, Vol. 7, 2014, pp. 391-392, <https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2175>

[9] J. Qiu & R. Stone, ‘Chinese mission ushers in new era of lunar exploration’, Science, Vol. 342, 2013, pp. 1026, <http://science.sciencemag.org/content/342/6162/1026>

[10] Retrieved from the Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Launch Services website – <http://h2a.mhi.co.jp/en/index.html>

[11] K.R.S. Murthi & M.K. Rao, ‘Privatizing space missions: The critical route to boost Indian space economy’, New Space, Vol. 4, 2016, pp. 237-242, <http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/space.2016.0007?journalCode=space>

[12] Retrieved from the ISRO website – <https://www.isro.gov.in/Spacecraft/gsat-9>

[13] I. Funaki et al., Hall thruster system design for high delta-V missions. Retrieved from the JAXA website <http://www.hayabusa.isas.jaxa.jp/kawalab/astro/pdf/2015A_9.pdf>

[14] Retrieved from the Hitachi High Tech Global website – https://www.hitachi-hightech.com/global/here-and-now/04/index.html

[15] D. Guangliang et al., ‘Initial result of the Chinese deep space station’s coordinates from Chinese domestic VLBI experiments’ Science China Information Sciences, Vol. 60, 2017, <http://engine.scichina.com/publisher/scp/journal/SCIS/60/1/10.1007/s11432-016-0195-9?slug=full%20text>

TAGGED UNDER: , , , , , ,